IT’S
FACTS THAT COUNT NOT EMOTIONS
When dealing with disciplinary
matters and individual labour-law disputes, greater
focus has to be placed on managing such risks
in a cost effective manner. Too many cases are
being handled by means of a costly and mechanical
approach, and unfortunately, the presence of subjective
emotions in dealing with these matters effectively,
is too prevalent amongst both employers and employees.
Hereunder are some examples where
emotions have cost the employer and employee dearly
and which highlight some very important learning
points, mistakes made and issues to consider when
planning and implementing these customary industrial
relations (IR)/ labour-law processes.
The first example is that of
a senior accountant who referred his alleged unfair
dismissal to the CCMA for arbitration. The employer
had a strong case on the merits. However, a primary
witness had emigrated and the company was forced,
at all costs, to negotiate a financial settlement.
Notwithstanding the aforesaid
predicament, which the other side was not aware
of, the individual believed that he was entitled
to a 24-month (R400 000) settlement even though
his dismissal was not an automatically unfair
one. In the five days preceding the arbitration,
the individual, his labour lawyer and the company’s
advocate met three times. No amount of explanation,
from both legal representatives could induce the
emotionally charged individual to understand,
for example, that he would not get an arbitration
award remotely close to his perceived and legally
unjustifiable entitlement, if anything at all.
It was only the day before arbitration,
when he realised that he would have to represent
himself, that he settled on three months (R51
000) and still had to pay his own legal fees of
approximately R16 000. This was very fortunate
for the company as it would probably have received
a much greater award due to the absence of an
important witness.
Another case that comes to mind
is that of a sales executive who was charged by
his employer with misconduct, mainly insubordination
and non-performance-related issues. After having
charged the individual, the company appointed
a labour-law advocate to chair the disciplinary
hearing and an external IR consultant to act as
prosecutor. A total 107 (90) minute tapes and
a direct expense of R760 000.00 bear testimony
to the duration and cost, notwithstanding the
prosecutor having withdrawn many charges in order
to save time and costs.
However, early in the disciplinary
proceedings, the IR consultant pre-empted the
possible duration and cost, and advised the board,
which conceded to offering a settlement of up
to 12 months (R204 000). Settlement was not to
be as the employee wanted payment until he some
day found another job. This was unacceptable to
the board and the disciplinary hearing continued.
The outcome was a dismissal in the inevitable
CCMA arbitration and after that, a further R340
000.00 was spent in legal fees. The dismissal
was upheld. This was an unfortunate and costly
exercise for the employer and for the emotional
individual who had forsaken a R204 000.00 settlement
and still had to pay his own legal fees.
Another emotions-driven example
is that of the owner of a medium-sized manufacturing
concern which was at the receiving end of a default
judgement of 24 months’ compensation for
dismissing a female employee, in writing due to
her pregnancy, which is an automatically unfair
dismissal. The employer’s reputable labour
lawyer, who only got involved after the award,
was trying to explain to this self-righteous employer
that there are no legally justifiable grounds
at all for a rescission application and that he
was merely wasting time and money.
From these cases it is obvious
that one must always bear in mind that emotions
do not win any arbitration or Labour Court cases,
but that facts do. Rather use your head and not
your heart when tying to resolve individual disputes,
by facing practical realities and managing your
risks.
If you need any assistance or
advice, feel free to contact our Lesley Ramulifho
at 012 342 9895 or Lesley@legaledge.co.za.
Prepared by: Lesley
Ramulifho
PETZER, DU TOIT & RAMULIFHO